This is a site about Pro Yakyu (Japanese Baseball), not about who the next player to go over to MLB is. It's a community of Pro Yakyu fans who have come together to share their knowledge and opinions with the world. It's a place to follow teams and individuals playing baseball in Japan (and Asia), and to learn about Japanese (and Asian) culture through baseball.
It is my sincere hope that once you learn a bit about what we're about here that you will join the community of contributors.
Michael Westbay
(aka westbaystars)
Founder
While I don't always agree with how Christopher presents many issues, I do agree with him that Okada-kantoku is clueless with regard to why some things work and others don't.
It's like the sacrifice bunt. Some managers just do it automatically because that's what they saw as a key strategy to the L.A. Dodgers in a spring camp about 50 years ago, or Mori-kantoku's sacrificing success with the Lions of the later 1980s. But Mori-kantoku wasn't sacrificing for the sake of sacrificing, he knew his team's strengths and weaknesses and that team worked well with it. He had a purpose. Hillman-kantoku used it efficiently last season - but he understood his team and why it worked in certain situations - but not every situation with a runner on first and nobody out.
The announcers call it a manager's "winning pattern." That is, the manager will run on auto-pilot in hopes that his team will just fall into the pattern that has won games in the past - despite the differences from one game to another.
Okada-kantoku, Hara-kantoku, and several others have always struck me as managers with a fixed algorithm that they will apply over and over to any and all similar situations covering a limited number of variables. And it's always bothered me that they don't take other variables into account.