Adjust Font Size: A A       Guest settings   Register

Comparison of Professional Leagues

Discussion in the Nichi-Bei forum
Comparison of Professional Leagues
Just finished an excellent book, Baseball's Other All-Stars by William F. McNeil, a survey of great baseball players who never played in MLB, including Negro, Cuban and Japanese league stars. Fun stuff. The author did some number crunching to better compare the leagues and players. A useful comparison from the book between MLB and NPB -- using stats from 66 players (260,000+ at bats) who played in both MLB and NPB -- follows:
LeagueABHDTHRBA
Major Leagues55014325619.260
Japanese Leagues55015321142.278

Using those stats as a baseline, it's possible to make an educated guess as to how a player going from one league to another will perform. Let's use Godzilla Matsui as an example.

Past 3-year NPB average (550 at-bats baseline):

ABHDTHRBASlg.OBPOPS
55017530246.318.631.4381069

Adjusted to MLB using the above comparison:

ABHDTHRBASlg.OBPOPS
550164361221.298.515.428943

Of course there are a few holes to this method (12 triples? No way.) but it's better than the shots in the dark that were being throw around by yours truly and others in the Baseball America's Two Cents thread. Just look at Ichiro predicted number using this method versus his actual 2001 MLB numbers for evidence.

 DTHRBA
Predicted36128.331
Actual3488.350

Not bad.

[Edited by: westbaystars on Jan 26, 2002 10:03 AM - converted stats into tables]

Comments
Re: Comparison of Professional Leagues
[ Author: Guest | Posted: Jan 28, 2002 12:48 AM ]

You can't compair the MLB to Japanese baseball. Their are to many things that are different and the styles of play are totally different.
Re: Comparison of Professional Leagues
[ Author: westbaystars | Posted: Jan 28, 2002 9:30 AM | YBS Fan ]

I must disagree with the above Guest in this case. And the above study does show that it is possible to compare the two. While the styles of play are different, as the Guess points out, such differences should be calculatable from statistics.

The biggest possible flaw in the above study that I can think of is that I believe that it compares players going from the Majors to Pro Yakyu, rather than the other way around. It isn't specified how many of those 66 players got their big break in Japan (like Boomer) before their MLB careers really started, so adjusting from NPB to MLB may be different.

Also, with regard to triples, how many of the 66 players compared were from the time period of smaller stadiums and the Lucky Zone? That would have had the effect of increased home runs in Japan with fewer triples.

Finally, I don't understand the 550 AB baseline. 260,000 at bats divided by 66 players is about 4,000 at bats per player. Is it divided 50/50 between MLB and NPB at bats? I guess I need to buy the book to find out. (And it does sound like a book I would enjoy.)

Nonetheless, those are the only arguements that I can think of to support Guest-san's claims. (I would welcome more arguements against - with evidence.) But as 1908-san pointed out, it was close in predicting a number of Ichiro's stats. Of course it wasn't right on for everything, but it isn't supposed to be. It's an approximation based on statistical analysis and comparisons of different players. A pair of larger variable than style differences between the leagues would be personality of the players and what point in their career they were at (fading/rising) when headed to either JPB or MLB. The tables and/or article don't cover those variables.

If comparing the two leagues is impossible, then why is it that requests for a comparison is one of the most frequently questions I get? I would love to read more statistial comparisons like this one. And since statistical comparisons of the leagues are still in their infancy, their accuracy may not be very high in all aspects, yet. The key word is "yet." As more players cross over from Japan, more data will be collected, and a more accurate set of variables may be derived.
Flaws
[ Author: 1908 | Posted: Jan 29, 2002 9:32 AM | HT Fan ]

The biggest possible flaw in the above study that I can think of is that I believe that it compares players going from the Majors to Pro Yakyu, rather than the other way around. It isn't specified how many of those 66 players got their big break in Japan (like Boomer) before their MLB careers really started, so adjusting from NPB to MLB may be different.

Good point. Players like Cecil Fielder -- who went from MLB to NPB and then back to MLB -- are included in the study, but I don't know enough about the other players listed to answer your question.

Also, with regard to triples, how many of the 66 players compared were from the time period of smaller stadiums and the Lucky Zone? That would have had the effect of increased home runs in Japan with fewer triples.

Another valid point. A similiar thought occured to me when I first saw the data. I suspect you're right but -- again -- my knowledge of past NPB players is too limited to be certain. I'd re-print the whole table but don't want to step on any copyright toes.

Finally, I don't understand the 550 AB baseline.

550 is the average number of at bats a typical MLB player has in a season. I suspect the author chose that number to make comparisons easier and I just followed his lead. Since we're dealing with ratios, the stats can be adjusted easily to any at-bat number you'd like.

260,000 at bats divided by 66 players is about 4,000 at bats per player. Is it divided 50/50 between MLB and NPB at bats?

No, the split isn't even. The players in question had 90,000 NPB at bats total versus 170,000 MLB at bats. But there are a number of players who had more NPB than MLB at bats across thier careers -- 3, 4 times as many in some cases. The reverse is true, of course. In my opinion, both samples are large enough to make some inferences from.

I guess I need to buy the book to find out. (And it does sound like a book I would enjoy.)

I certainly did. Be forewarned that only 30 pages or so of the book's 200 deal with the Japanese leagues. The best NPB stars are included on the author's Ultimate All-World, All-Star team and discussed some more in that chapter, however. The statisical comparisons alone make the book worthwhile.






Re: Comparison of Professional Leagues
[ Author: Guest: PeterG | Posted: Jan 31, 2002 4:00 AM ]

Re: Comparison of Professional Leagues
[ Author: 1908 | Posted: Jan 31, 2002 9:43 AM | HT Fan ]

Very much, Peter. Like that article, the aforementioned book also ranks NPB above AAA (see below). The gap between the two is more substantial according to Mr. Davenport's figures, however.

LeagueABHDTHRBA
MLB55014325619.260
NPB55015321142.278
AAA55015926620.287

Baseball Prospectus
[ Author: westbaystars | Posted: Jan 31, 2002 12:53 PM | YBS Fan ]

Wow! That was an interesting article. That's a site I'm bookmarking now. Hopefully I'll be able to help him with some of his data searching for NPB soon as well.

Some of the terminology was beyond me. I guess I haven't read enough about baseball statistics in English to get all of the technical jargon, yet. But I don't think that'll take long.

Thank you for the link.
Baseball Prospectus article, part 2
[ Author: 1908 | Posted: Feb 23, 2002 4:37 AM | HT Fan ]

Re: Comparison of Professional Leagues
[ Author: OloiolO | Posted: Feb 15, 2002 7:30 PM ]

That sounds like a terrific read. A world-wide effort to creat an international hall of fame could lead to a lot of very interesting research. It will take a thousand baseball fans at a thousand typewriters a thousand years to sort out the vast differences between the leagues and eras. Still, I look forward to someday being able to make meaningful comparisons of Ichiro Suzuki and Oscar Charleston, or Omar Linares and Honus Wagner. Very ambitious!
Did the author attempt to make distinctions between the tendencies of the Pacific and Central Leagues? The disparity in park dimensions may be greater than the disparity between talent levels in the MLB and NPB. I can't see the sense in seeking a baseline that splits the difference. That would make even the best Central League hitters project to lower levels than a half dozen Pacific League sluggers.
Re: Comparison of Professional Leagues
[ Author: pacific | Posted: May 7, 2002 4:03 PM ]

It is interesting and I hope it can be done. I also disagree with the guest that it is measurable and comparable. The whole reason sabrmetrics were made was to compare different eras in history as well as different leagues. That is what all these statistics for. A neutral measure of player performance. All are estimated but they give one a good idea of what they would actually do given a large enough sample size. American baseball itself has huge differences from one era to the next not the least the Deadball era or in old Shibe park that a ball was a ground rule double if it was lost in the series of fans seated on the field(you can check it is true). So it is comparable. And I think a joint Hall of fame would be excellent. It would as said would produce terrific amounts of data to help future research.
About

This is a site about Pro Yakyu (Japanese Baseball), not about who the next player to go over to MLB is. It's a community of Pro Yakyu fans who have come together to share their knowledge and opinions with the world. It's a place to follow teams and individuals playing baseball in Japan (and Asia), and to learn about Japanese (and Asian) culture through baseball.

It is my sincere hope that once you learn a bit about what we're about here that you will join the community of contributors.

Michael Westbay
(aka westbaystars)
Founder

Search for Pro Yakyu news and information
Copyright (c) 1995-2024 JapaneseBaseball.com.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Some rights reserved.